Benefits Of A Family Strengths Assessment For Clinical Practice And Pr

Question: Discuss about the Benefits Of A Family Strengths Assessment For Clinical Practice And Promoting. Answer: The Australian Family StrengthsNursing Assessment (AFSNA) is designed to give nurses an ability to describe families basing on the most important qualities of affection, togetherness, positive communication, acceptance, sharing activities, commitment, support, spiritual well-being, and resilience. The tools help nurses to understand relationships and systems of individuals with the other members of a family. Families are complex and assessment of strengths of families enables the provision of health care services beyond the traditional holistic in culturally safe settings. Strengths in the functioning and working of the family and the patient as a whole person help in the provision of better support through health care decisions. It is based on the strongest characteristics to fortify a family rather than improving the weaknesses in the functioning of a family (Barbara, Brage, John, 2007). The multi-disciplinary teams and nurses will then be able to figure out the health position, understand what the situation means to the individual family and hence address their specific needs. Every family setting has its own understanding of treatment procedures and diseases in addition to the differences in strengths and weaknesses. This means that a generalized approach by the nurses will not be effective in the provision of healthcare services. There is a need for an approach for a collaborative relationship between the family, patient, MDT, and nurses. Working together with the stakeholders will develop an applicable solution to health problems through shared decision-making will create a patient-centered healthcare plan (Smith, Ford, 2013) Nurses will help families to outline their visions, goals, future hopes by the provision of counselling and support for improved health. The support measures are centered at the identification of strengths and provision of feedback, assisting in the development of the goals and offer information services about community resources and services. Strength-based care will examine the ability of a person in coping with challenges of health and life basing on what is best and what will function well for the family. The nurses are also enabled to structure a person-centered care plan to provide an efficient and effective outcome (Elisabeth, Grafton, Reid Andrea, 2017). Knowledge of the strengths of a patient will help the health professionals to deal with the parties involved in developing their inner-strength for coping with a problem and create apt solutions. The principles of empowerment, collaborative partnerships, healing, and health promotion and the person-centered care are the principles of the Family StrengthsNursing Assessment approach. The family will be empowered to deal with challenges hence building their confidence in the recovery process (Smith L. Ford K., 2013) In conclusion, the participation of the family in decision-making will respect their unique strengths as identified in their specific abilities, competencies, and skills. Culture and beliefs make the strengths of families to be specific to each one. The approach provides a basis for understanding the health experience of families and their needs linked the situations of weaknesses. Bibliography Barbara S., Brage H., John D.., 2007. Using the concept of family strengths to enhance nursing care. The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 32(6), pp. 353-357. Elisabeth C., Grafton E. , Reid A., Andrea M., 2017. Understanding family assessment in the Australian context; what are adult oncology nursing practices?. Collegian, 24(2), pp. 175-182. Smith L. Ford K., 2013. Communication with children, young people and familiesa family strengths-based approach. Child, Youth and Family Health: Strengthening Communities, 4(1), p. 91. Smith, L. Ford, K., 2013. Family strengths and the Australian Family Strengths Nursing Assessment Guide. Family Health, 23(9), pp. 98-105.